1. The main of this article regarding manipulating pictures was that it is getting easier to edit them and change them. Back when the camera was invented editing pictures was a thing. but now it has been easier and easier to edit and manipulate them.  

2. The philosophy of New York times are that the photographers have to turn in all of their proofs to prove they didn't change the photo in a way that will alter the story dramatically.

3. I think you can alter stuff that will help you see the image like for example the lighting but not edit it drastically like for example editing a picture of a presidential candidate to make them look bad.

4.

I think this is unethical because it makes OJ Simpson look even more bad or "menacing".  The editing was used to be against a person.












5. I think this photo of the pyramids is the least unethical because it doesn't look edited and it is not used to be against  anyone. It is manipulating objects and that is not as ab as manipulating people.